The Anahita Temple of Kangavar, after years of neglect and damage caused by construction activities, has entered a new phase of protection, archaeological investigation, and site management. With the completion of infrastructure projects, plans for an archaeological museum, and the continuation of excavation and conservation work, the site is now being prepared as part of the proposed “Parthian–Sasanian Archaeological Landscape from the Temple of Anahita to Taq Kasra” nomination. This serial heritage project seeks the inscription of a connected historical landscape on UNESCO’s World Heritage List.
Five major archaeological excavation campaigns have been carried out at the site so far, and current efforts focus on completing visitor facilities, establishing a museum, expanding research, and advancing restoration programmes.
The Temple of Anahita was designated a national heritage project in 1968, yet safeguarding the monumental stone complex proved challenging. Residential buildings once occupied parts of the archaeological area, historical stones were removed for secondary uses such as lime production, and construction activities continued within the site over several periods. Years of interrupted conservation work also contributed to serious damage across sections of the monument.
Nearly 320 residential units have since been removed from the site, but this did not end the challenges. Architectural remains from different historical periods still survive beneath and around the complex, making continued archaeological investigation essential for understanding the monument’s history, development, and function.
Research activities resumed in recent years after a period of inactivity, bringing renewed attention to conservation, excavation, and the organisation of the surrounding landscape. Although five major excavation phases have been undertaken, many questions remain unanswered. The complex nature of the structure and the presence of architectural remains from later periods require further study in order to reconstruct the sequence of occupation and changes in use over time.
One of the principal unresolved issues concerns the original function of the monument itself. Whether the structure known today as the Temple of Anahita fully corresponds to earlier historical interpretations remains an open question, and further archaeological evidence is needed to clarify its purpose.
In recent years, protection of the site has been prioritised through improved fencing, surveillance systems, lighting, and controlled access. Efforts have also focused on strengthening public awareness and encouraging local communities to regard the monument as an important part of their historical and cultural identity.
Environmental improvements have accompanied these measures. Access routes have been reorganised, visitor facilities upgraded, parking areas established, and incompatible activities around the site removed. Landscaping projects and the creation of green spaces have further enhanced both the appearance and protection of the archaeological area.
Among the most significant developments is the transformation of the surrounding route into a pedestrian walkway integrated with the urban fabric of Kangavar. Plans are also underway for the establishment of an archaeological museum that will display artefacts associated with the site and provide visitors with historical context before entering the monument.
Much of the required infrastructure is expected to be completed in the near future, allowing greater attention to be directed toward excavation and restoration. Conservation, however, will proceed only after sufficient research has been conducted, ensuring that all interventions are firmly based on archaeological and historical evidence.
Beyond restoration, the most important long-term objective is the preparation of the UNESCO World Heritage nomination, linking the Temple of Anahita with related Parthian and Sasanian sites and extending westward to Taq Kasra in present-day Iraq. The project aims to present these interconnected monuments as a single cultural landscape reflecting centuries of historical exchange and development.
Within this broader narrative, Kangavar occupies a significant position as a historical crossroads connecting eastern and western regions of Iran through major communication routes across successive periods, from the Median and Achaemenid eras to the Parthian and Sasanian periods. Efforts are currently underway to complete the nomination dossier over the coming years, with the goal of securing international recognition for this remarkable and interconnected heritage landscape.
Page Term Reference
Comments