Statement on the Criminal Consequences of Using Claims of Divine Superiority to Justify the Persecution of Peoples and Nations
Throughout history, one of the most dangerous forms of political and social abuse has occurred when individuals, governments, or movements claim that they possess a special divine status or that they represent a uniquely chosen group in order to justify domination, discrimination, violence, or the dehumanization of others. No religious belief, historical narrative, or ideological claim can serve as a legitimate basis for denying the humanity, dignity, rights, or existence of another people.
The concept of being “chosen” or spiritually significant exists within several religious traditions and is interpreted in many different ways. However, when such concepts are transformed into claims of racial, ethnic, or national superiority—and then used to portray other communities as inferior, impure, dangerous, or deserving of punishment—they become tools of oppression. History has repeatedly shown that narratives of superiority can create conditions in which persecution, forced displacement, collective punishment, and mass atrocities become possible.
Under international law, individuals and state actors may face criminal responsibility when they use ideology, religion, ethnicity, or nationalism as justification for crimes against humanity, war crimes, or acts of genocide. The prohibition against targeting civilians, committing collective punishment, forcibly transferring populations, or deliberately destroying communities is a fundamental principle of international humanitarian law. These protections exist because every human life has equal value, regardless of nationality, ethnicity, religion, or political identity.
The international community has established legal frameworks to address such crimes, including accountability for:
-
Genocide, including acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group.
-
Crimes against humanity, including widespread or systematic attacks against civilian populations such as murder, persecution, forced displacement, and other forms of severe abuse.
-
War crimes, including deliberate attacks on civilians, unlawful destruction, starvation of populations as a method of warfare, and other violations of the laws of armed conflict.
-
Incitement to violence and persecution, where public statements or propaganda encourage others to commit atrocities against a protected group.
The suffering of civilians in conflicts around the world—including in Gaza, Ukraine, Sudan, Myanmar, and many other regions—demonstrates the urgent need to reject any ideology that excuses mass suffering through claims of superiority, destiny, or collective guilt. Civilians are not responsible for the actions of governments, armed groups, or political leaders. Punishing an entire population for the actions of individuals or organizations is both morally unacceptable and, in many circumstances, legally prohibited.
It is essential to make a clear distinction between:
-
A religious community and the actions of specific individuals or governments;
-
A nation’s population and the decisions of its political or military leadership;
-
Legitimate criticism of policies and actions versus hatred or discrimination against an entire people.
Holding governments, military officials, and political leaders accountable for unlawful actions is a principle of justice. Likewise, protecting religious and ethnic communities from hatred and collective blame is also a principle of justice. These principles must apply equally to all peoples.
The belief that one group is superior to another—whether based on religion, ethnicity, nationality, race, or ideology—has historically been used to justify some of humanity’s greatest tragedies. Modern international law rejects such ideas by affirming a universal principle: no people are above the law, and no people are beneath its protection.
True justice requires accountability for those who commit or enable atrocities, protection for victims regardless of identity, and a commitment to a world where human rights are not determined by faith, ancestry, nationality, or political power.
No claim of divine authority can remove human responsibility. No historical grievance can justify crimes against innocent people. And no nation or community can achieve lasting security through the suffering, humiliation, or destruction of another.
PARS ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT